Dealing with Fake Chargebacks
Chargebacks represent one of the biggest risks faced by merchants accepting credit cards. Not only are they costly, but they can also jeopardize the good standing of your merchant account. Both Visa and MasterCard allow no more than 1% of the total number of your transactions to be charged back in any given month and your processor is likely to force you to implement preventive measures long before you reach this threshold. Moreover, once you get into trouble with chargebacks, your funds will probably be withheld until you can prove that your chargebacks are under control.
Most of the time legitimate businesses can rein in chargebacks by building their sales procedures around a set of best practices for processing transactions and communicating with customers and these are reviewed in great detail in our Chargeback Manual.
Unfortunately chargebacks are not always caused by fraud or processing errors or otherwise caused by a deficiency in the merchant’s sales processing procedures. In many instances customers try to game the system by charging back legitimate transactions for which they are responsible. Sadly, they often succeed. So what do you do about it? Well, you should keep transaction details in your system for a year (transactions can be charged back to you within six months of the transaction date). You should also work closely with your processing bank and provide all relevant information to be represented whenever a chargeback is initiated.
New services are offering help with preventing chargebacks as well. A website – www.badcustomer.com – provides businesses with the option to list bad customers in their database, as well as to check for potential scammers before shipping merchandise or providing a service.
Yet, chances are that you will never eliminate fake chargebacks completely. When all else fails, you should not hesitate to recover losses through collection efforts. Once you have determined that the customer has actually received the goods or services at issue, you should:
- Send collection messages via emails and letters to collect low dollar amounts. For low dollar amount transactions, the most cost-effective tools at your disposal are the email and the letter. Send one of each to your customer requesting that the amount at issue is paid in full by a certain date. If you have received a letter from your customer as part of the transaction dispute, attempt to address his or her concerns and resolve the issue in a way that is mutually satisfactory.
- Call your customer. Customers who do not respond to emails and letters should be contacted by phone. Once again you should firmly request that the outstanding balance is paid in full by a certain date.
- Employ external collection agencies for remaining customers with unpaid balances. Some customers will not respond to your internal collection efforts and should be outsourced to external collection agencies. Collection agencies are typically paid on a contingent basis. Their rates vary depending on a multitude of factors, including total amount of the unpaid accounts, average account balance, age of the accounts (measured from the date the balance first became due), etc. Before selecting a collection agency, you should thoroughly evaluate the candidates and check their references. Make sure that they have experience working with other businesses in your industry and that their recovery rates are adequate. Also important is to verify that the prospects are complying with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and that employing them will not hurt your reputation.
Learn how to minimize chargebacks
Learn how to minimize chargebacks and reduce your processing costs. The Chargeback Management kit contains a video and an e-book:
- E-Book – Chargeback Manual (40 pages).
- Video – Card Acceptance Best Practices for Lowest Processing Costs (18 min).



Says:
May 30th, 2010 at 11:02 am
[...] you identified the duplicate transaction and processed an offsetting credit before you received the chargeback, inform your processing bank of the date the credit was [...]
Says:
May 30th, 2010 at 12:39 pm
[...] the tip and add it to the bill. An automatically added tip can result in a customer dispute and a chargeback. Rather, the merchant must obtain an authorization approval from the card issuer for the full [...]
Says:
May 30th, 2010 at 12:51 pm
[...] SecureCode are in most cases protected from “unauthorized use” types of chargebacks. If you participate in these programs and receive a fully authenticated or attempted authentication [...]
Says:
May 30th, 2010 at 1:04 pm
[...] for a minimum of six months, however MasterCard can increase it to a 12-month period. A six-month chargeback period is applied for less than $8,000 in cumulative fraud for three months following the month in [...]
Says:
May 31st, 2010 at 10:29 am
[...] Incidental and additional charges. Often, the final transaction amount differs from the original booking estimate. There can be plenty of reasons for such a discrepancy. For example, the consumer may request to keep the car for a longer period than what was originally agreed, and the added days may be charged at a different rate. Or the consumer may be charged for car damages that the rental company claims occurred during the rental period. There are a number of other charges that may prompt a customer dispute. Whether the disputes are justified or not, there is a direct correlation between customer disputes and chargebacks, so minimizing disputes results in fewer chargebacks. [...]
Says:
May 31st, 2010 at 11:45 am
[...] Chargebacks are the single biggest factor why e-commerce businesses get into trouble with their merchant accounts. Visa and MasterCard have both set a limit of 1 percent on the number of charged-back transactions, in relation to the total number of transactions processed each month. In reality, payment processors will usually suspend a merchant account long before the chargeback ratio reaches 1 percent, because they are fined substantial sums by the Associations for each merchant designated as an excessive chargeback merchant. [...]
Says:
May 31st, 2010 at 5:10 pm
[...] be completely eliminated, although merchants can take steps to reduce them in number. Many of the chargebacks are a result of improper transaction processing procedures and can be easily avoided with making [...]
Says:
June 4th, 2010 at 7:57 am
[...] merchants (CMM) – merchants with a CTR in excess of 0.5% and at least 50 chargebacks in a calendar [...]
Says:
July 1st, 2010 at 10:09 am
[...] codes 71 and 4808? Merchants who follow standard authorization procedures will see few, if any, chargeback reason codes 71 or 4808. In particular, to avoid this type of chargebacks, you [...]
Says:
August 5th, 2010 at 6:46 pm
[...] fraud-related chargebacks. Chargebacks are costly and, as mentioned above, can lead to the suspension or closure of your [...]